Droplr vs cloudapp code#

There is no way to directly enter text for creating and sharing code and notes. It uses a standard file chooser to select a new file to upload. The web app is usable but not as easy as Droplr. This really does make organizing and collecting screenshots easy. One menu toggle will auto-upload all screenshots to CloudApp.

Droplr vs cloudapp mac#

In addition to the excellent plugin system, CloudApp on the Mac has another unique and powerful feature. Triggering CloudApp while viewing a page in Safari, Chrome or Firefox, uploads a bookmark link. Triggering CloudApp while selecting a track in iTunes automatically uploads it. They all trigger off of the same keyboard shortcut. For example, Photoshop, iPhoto and iTunes. Each one allows CloudApp to plugin to a different application. To take advantage of this wonderful API, CloudApp provides a plugin architecture for the Mac application called Raindrops. This certainly adds value to the platform and is encouraging for continued growth.

Droplr vs cloudapp windows#

There is a Windows app and many iOS apps integrate with the service. This probably explains the prevalence of CloudApp’s third party apps. There is a broad offering of supported platforms and very direct and simple instructions. Where CloudApp really shines 2 is its API. It’s a fast system that seems like it is the geekier of the two options. They are both winners but I still have a preference for one. If you already have a favorite, then stick with it. Perhaps the CloudApp policy is more realistic. I like how the Droplr policy reads a bit better than the CloudApp policy. They both have reasonable privacy policies. Both apps also display a history of uploaded files in the menubar drop down with a running count of the number of clicks on each link.īoth apps provide a quick action to launch the web app which is the only way to organize, edit and delete uploads from the Mac. When complete, the application displays a Growl alert and places the link on the clipboard. Files can be directly dropped on the menu bar icon.

On the Mac, both apps are nearly equivalent. These are top notch services and their apps are well designed and engineered.

Both CloudApp and Droplr provide excellent web access, which is important for me since I work on Windows most of the day. There are native Mac, iOS, Web applications. Common Groundīoth services provide convenient tools for uploading a file and grabbing a link to share. That means Mac, iOS and Web access matter and that’s how I’ve structured this comparison. 1 I want a system that will allow me to capture from anywhere and get back a link. But I’ve been looking for a more convenient and ubiquitous sharing solution so I have been test driving Droplr and CloudApp. I use the FTP host for posting to Macdrifter and I use the S3 links for sharing with friends. I use this system every day and it works like a charm. I have my own FTP upload and Amazon S3 push, both built on Hazel. I’ve built many custom solutions for uploading and sharing files.